Imbalance between the interests of the organization and the member states: large and small states
Keywords:
International Organization, State and Sovereignty.Abstract
Since ancient times, many actors have entered competition on the international scene, including States, International Organizations, Transnational Societies, Non-Governmental Organizations, Liberation Movements and, to a certain extent, private people, etc. It is from this perspective that society always strives for the establishment of a harmonious relationship between its components. Hence, normal social inequalities whose harmful effects deserve to be alleviated. In concrete, on the international scene, the existence of large and small states can be observed. In fact, the sociology of international relations teaches that, in this world becoming independent, states maintain multiple relations with each other, transnational cooperation ties have multiplied in the economic, social, cultural and scientific fields. The State, which becomes the point of reference for international exchanges, must meet a certain number of parameters to expect to participate actively in the international scene, which is essentially competitive. The possession or non-possession of these parameters confers on the State the necessary triumphs of its action on the international scene. These triumphs are of different orders: geographical, economic, scientific, cultural, military. Thus, we can note that the world has truly encountered in the twenty-first century with the institutional world disorder marked by the regulation of the world by international organizations where the weak have no place. We have evolved since after the Cold War, moving towards a world without sovereignty, a world of impotence, of power, where geoeconomics supported by the globalization of the economy and finance is seen as the ideal framework for the enemy's action in international relations. As an example, the behavior of the current US administration. From the point of view of public international law, the State as a subject of international law enjoys an International Statute that has as its cornerstones two fundamental principles, which are sovereignty and equality.
Downloads
References
Bakandeja, W. K., Mbata Betukumesu, M. A., & Kienge, I. R. (2007). Participação e responsabilidade dos atores no contexto da emergência democrática na República do Congo. Acta da Jornada Científica da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Kinshasa.
Bangoura, D. (2002). União africana face aos desafios da paz, da segurança e da defesa. Paris.
Basue, B. (2012). Organizações internacionais. ULK.
Basue, B. (2014). Direito internacional público. Unikin.
Carta das Nações Unidas de 1948.
Fulbert Sassou, A. (sem data). Unidade africana de Kvvame Kruma à União africana de Kadhafi. Armattan.
Jaque, D. E. (2000). Direito constitucional T.1: Princípios estruturais. Universitárias africanas.
João Mota de Campos. (2010). Organizações internacionais. Coimbra.
Leuprecht, P. (sem data). Direito humano, direito dos povos, o mundo diplomático. Paris.
Liniger Goumaz. (sem data). ONU e ditaduras da democracia e dos direitos humanos. Harmattan.
Makumbundundu, N. (2013). Os interesses da organização. Conferência. UNIKIVI.
Mangemosi, L. M. (2016). Nova geopolítica da África média. Instituto Panafricano de Relações Internacionais e Estratégicas.
Maria Manuela Magalhães Silva & Dora Resende Alpes. (2010). Noções de direito constitucional e ciência política.
Mavungu, I. P. (1997). Direito internacional público.
Wladimir Brito. (2008). Direito internacional público. Coimbra.
Yewawa Gbiamango, A. N. (1997). Vida internacional. Universidade Protestante do Zaire.
Tratado de Desnuclearização de fundos de 1971.
Tratado sobre a Interdição das Armas Bacteriológicas de 1972.
